<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I Am Awesome &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iamawesome.net/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iamawesome.net</link>
	<description>Pretending the Internet cares about me since 2009.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jay-Z, Apple, and SQL Go Together Like Crappy SEO</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2010/05/jay-z-apple-and-sql-go-together-like-crappy-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2010/05/jay-z-apple-and-sql-go-together-like-crappy-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just showed up as a comment awaiting moderation on my other blog:
Thanks for sharing this post, I found this article while googling for some information on SQL, useful comments and great points made.
The title of the blog post in question? Apple Inspired by Disney from 2004. The topic? How what looks like a FireWire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just showed up as a comment awaiting moderation on my other blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>Thanks for sharing this post, I found this article while googling for some information on SQL, useful comments and great points made.</p></blockquote>
<p>The title of the blog post in question? <a href="http://blog.conigs.com/2004/08/apple-inspired-by-disney/">Apple Inspired by Disney</a> from 2004. The topic? How what looks like a FireWire logo is in the floor of the ship in Flight of the Navigator. I doubt that post came up while googling for SQL info. What&#8217;s even more perplexing is the link provided by the spammer: www.musiclyricsnow.net/j/jayz/forever-young/</p>
<p>So, spammers &amp; SEO idiots — still not awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2010/05/jay-z-apple-and-sql-go-together-like-crappy-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quicky – Frivolous Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/07/quicky-%e2%80%93-frivolous-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/07/quicky-%e2%80%93-frivolous-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[really?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently Apple (as well as the FBI and an auto mechanic) are conspiring with the Italian mafia, according to one man. I can&#8217;t really add anything to that.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Apple (as well as the FBI and an auto mechanic) are <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/17/a_hrefmailtoneilappleinsider_comneil_hughes_a.html">conspiring with the Italian mafia</a>, according to one man. I can&#8217;t really add anything to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/07/quicky-%e2%80%93-frivolous-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s Gently Encouraging Sharing, and There&#8217;s Whoring</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/theres-gently-encouraging-sharing-and-theres-whoring/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/theres-gently-encouraging-sharing-and-theres-whoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[really?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twinkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across this article about iPhone 3G tips/tricks on Hongkiat. All-in-all, an okay compilation of random how-tos… But that&#8217;s not what this post is about.
Now, I&#8217;m all for having social-network links in blog posts. Hell, you&#8217;ll notice them below posts on this site. I think these links should be there if you need them, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across this article about <a href="http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/25-most-wanted-tips-for-iphone-3g/">iPhone 3G tips/tricks</a> on Hongkiat. All-in-all, an okay compilation of random how-tos… But that&#8217;s not what this post is about.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m all for having social-network links in blog posts. Hell, you&#8217;ll notice them below posts on this site. I think these links should be there if you need them, but pretty unobtrusive. I like to think they&#8217;re pretty subtle here. Hongkiat, apparently, has a different opinion:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/link-whoring.png" rel="shadowbox[post-325];player=img;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-326 aligncenter" title="link-whoring" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/link-whoring-300x188.png" alt="link-whoring" width="300" height="188" /></a></p>
<p>This is what we call whoring. That image is only slightly narrower than the content column. The thing was (relatively) huge!  At least it wasn&#8217;t an insane list of sites a mile long, such as <a href="http://conigs.com/fark/real-tech-attention.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-325];player=img;">Real Tech News</a> a few years ago. (The image was made for a fark post a long time ago. They&#8217;ve gotten much better since then.)</p>
<p>Remember kids, Sharing is Caring™, until you force the diabetic kid to eat a Twinkie because you think it&#8217;s good for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/theres-gently-encouraging-sharing-and-theres-whoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Isn&#8217;t Expensive</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/software-isnt-expensive/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/software-isnt-expensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog.conigs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently wrote up a piece on blog.conigs concerning others&#8217; complaints about software price. The crux of the post:
Many people complain that some software is too expensive. I think it comes down to a fundamental difference in how software is viewed. I believe (most) software is a tool. I think others view (all) software as entertainment.
Have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently <a href="http://blog.conigs.com/2009/03/software-isnt-expensive/">wrote up a piece</a> on blog.conigs concerning others&#8217; complaints about software price. The crux of the post:</p>
<blockquote><p>Many people complain that some software is too expensive. I think it comes down to a fundamental difference in how software is viewed. I believe (most) software is a tool. I think others view (all) software as entertainment.</p></blockquote>
<p>Have a look at the <a href="http://blog.conigs.com/2009/03/software-isnt-expensive/">full post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/software-isnt-expensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone OS 3.0</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/iphone-os-30/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/iphone-os-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple distributed invitations for an event on March 17th. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s guessing here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/top.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-309];player=img;"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-310" title="top" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/top-150x150.jpg" alt="top" width="150" height="150" /></a>Apple <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10194846-37.html">distributed invitations</a> for an event on March 17th. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s guessing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/03/iphone-os-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle: Tweetie vs TwitterFon</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/battle-tweetie-vs-twitterfon/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/battle-tweetie-vs-twitterfon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweetie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitterfon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first signed up for Twitter, all I used was their website. Later, I ventured into Twitterrific on my Mac. Then I started tweeting from my iPhone. Now, there&#8217;s no shortage of Twitter clients on this device. There&#8217;s Twitterrific, Twinkle, Twittelator, Tweetsville, Tweetie, and TwitterFon to name a few. If you&#8217;re haven&#8217;t guessed by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>When I first signed up for Twitter, all I used was their website. Later, I ventured into <span>Twitterrific</span> on my Mac. Then I started tweeting from my iPhone. Now, there&#8217;s no shortage of Twitter clients on this device. There&#8217;s </span><a href="http://iconfactory.com/software/twitterrific"><span><span>Twitterrific</span></span></a>, <a href="http://tapulous.com/twinkle/">Twinkle</a>, <a href="http://www.stone.com/Twittelator/"><span><span>Twittelator</span></span></a>, <a href="http://www.tweetsville.com/"><span><span>Tweetsville</span></span></a>, <a href="http://www.atebits.com/software/tweetie/"><span><span>Tweetie</span></span></a>, and <a href="http://twitterfon.net/">TwitterFon</a><span> to name a few. If you&#8217;re haven&#8217;t guessed by the headline, this post will concern just the last two, <span>Tweetie</span> &amp; TwitterFon ($2.99 and free, respectively).</span><span id="more-51"></span></p>
<p><span>At first, I just used <span>Twitterrific</span>. It was simple, let me post and read the timeline, and most importantly, remembered where I left off between launches. But I started to want more: searching, trends, ability to follow/<span>unfollow</span>, etc. I think I started using TwitterFon around version 1.1. It was nice, but didn&#8217;t quite feel right. I kept hearing about <span>Tweetie</span> from many blogs and that it was, perhaps, the best Twitter client for the iPhone. So I bit and paid the $2.99 for version 1.1.</span></p>
<p><span>Now that both apps have been recently updated (<span>Tweetie</span> v1.2, TwitterFon v1.4 as of this writing), and include many similar features, I decided a comparison was in order. I&#8217;m not going to cover every single feature of each app, just the ones I tend to use.</span></p>
<h1><span><span>Tweetie</span></span></h1>
<p><span>Let&#8217;s start with the supposed best-of-the-best, <span>Tweetie</span>. The first thing I (or pretty much anyone else) will notice is the UI. By default, <span>Tweetie</span> uses a </span><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-bubbles.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">chat bubble interface</a> to show the timeline. Personally, I think this is wrong. The chat-bubble paradigm implies conversation; more specifically, conversation between parties. In Twitter-land, that would translate to everyone I&#8217;m following gathered in one room, all shouting. Since these tweets rarely follow the same topic, it would sound like a jumbled mess. Fortunately, you have the option of a &#8220;simple&#8221; theme.</p>
<p><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-refresh.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-60" title="tweetie-refresh" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-refresh-200x300.jpg" alt="tweetie-refresh" width="200" height="300" /></a><span>However, even with the simple theme, there are still oddities in the UI. Take, for example, the refresh button. While the iPhone has a decent resolution, especially for a mobile device, it&#8217;s still only a 3.5&#8243; screen. Every pixel matters. While, yes, I do value negative space in design, the horrible placement of the refresh button in <span>Tweetie</span> is not a good use of said negative space. When I get to the top of my timeline, the first visible piece of information I&#8217;m interested in is almost 1/3 down the screen.</span></p>
<p>Speaking of wasted space, <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-dm.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">the inbox/outbox buttons</a><span> in the direct-message view are huge, disconnected, and just plain don&#8217;t work, design-wise. Fortunately, I don&#8217;t spend a ton of time in this view as I rarely use <span>DMs</span>.</span></p>
<p><span>Then there&#8217;s the reply chain. The recent update of <span>Tweetie</span> has a nice way to drill down the chain, </span><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-replychain.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">both directions</a>. I think this works well, especially compared to previous versions. Previously, you could drill down through text links, but going back up the chain required using a navigation button at the top. This meant if I drilled down into 6-7 replies, I&#8217;d have to use what has essentially become a &#8220;back&#8221; button just as many times to get back to the timeline. This new method is much better.</p>
<p><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-fbar.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-59" title="tweetie-fbar" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-fbar.jpg" alt="tweetie-fbar" width="200" height="192" /></a><span>Speaking of replies, there is a new method of replying, <span>favoriting</span>, and seeing the user profile in <span>Tweetie</span>. Swipe across the tweet to bring up a small tool bar with those functions. This has been described as &#8220;</span><a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2009/01/16/iphone-app-tweetie-gets-drafts-instapaper-flashlight-farts">Hot UI Action</a><span>.&#8221; I kinda agree, with one major caveat: swiping in most apps (starting with Mobile Mail) means delete. You could get around this conceptually by thinking &#8220;delete is a right-to-left swipe, I&#8217;ll swipe left to right to &#8216;push&#8217; the tweet out of the way to get to these three buttons underneath.&#8221; True. But right-to-left swipe still does the same thing, even though the tweet visually moves off screen to the right. It just doesn&#8217;t </span><em>feel</em> right.</p>
<p><span>Often times, I want to search for trends, specific topics, or nearby tweets. <span>Tweetie</span> places all three of these functions (and two more) under the &#8220;More&#8221; tab at the bottom. Two things bother me about this view. I feel all three of these functions (nearby, trends, and text search) fall under the search umbrella, yet they are </span><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-search.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">listed separately</a>. Secondly, there is no &#8220;Edit&#8221; mode for the tab bar. So I&#8217;m stuck with the default order and placement. Want to put search or trends in the tab bar for easy access? Sorry.</p>
<p><span>Now, <span>Tweetie</span> does a few other things very, very well. I love having the ability to go to a person&#8217;s profile and select &#8220;search @<span>username</span>&#8221; to see who else is talking to that user. It&#8217;s a nice little feature to use if someone posts a question to the hive mind as John <span>Hodgman</span> </span><a href="http://twitter.com/hodgman/status/1124062291">likes to put it</a><span>. I can tell if that user already has their question answered. Also, if someone posts a picture using <span>twitpic</span>, <span>Tweetie</span> will bring up just the picture, not the entire <span>twitpic</span> page in a <span>Webkit</span> view. It&#8217;s a nice little touch that makes viewing pictures just a little nicer.</span></p>
<h1>TwitterFon</h1>
<div id="attachment_56" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-replychain.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="size-full wp-image-56" title="tf-replychain" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-replychain.jpg" alt="I didn't obscure the conversation because tater-tots are awesome." width="200" height="179" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I didn&#39;t obscure the conversation because tater-tots are awesome.</p></div>
<p><span>Now for TwitterFon. Basically, take most of my gripes about <span>Tweetie</span> and fix them. Let&#8217;s start with speech bubbles. The only place these are used is in reply chains and direct message views. In both instances, it makes sense. You&#8217;re looking at a conversation, usually about one topic. As a bonus, there&#8217;s no navigation required to view reply chains. It&#8217;s all right there. The one downside to <span>TwitterFon&#8217;s</span> implementation is that it only shows this view if you follow both parties involved. I&#8217;m also pretty sure it won&#8217;t display a reply chain for more than two people. I haven&#8217;t had the ability to test this yet.</span></p>
<p>The refresh button? It&#8217;s put in <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-refresh.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">the proper place</a><span>. Now, to be fair, <span>Tweetie</span> can&#8217;t use this space for the refresh button. It supports multiple accounts and that area is used to navigate back to an account list. But I&#8217;m sure there are better ways to implement that.</span></p>
<p>TwitterFon also places all three search functions <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-search.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">neatly on one page</a><span>. Type to search, hit the speech-bubbles button for a list of trends, or tap the cross-hairs to find nearby posts within 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, or 500 miles. It just makes sense. The result? A nicely laid out UI for search, and no need for a &#8220;More&#8221; tab at the bottom.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-friendbtn.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-53" title="tf-friendbtn" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-friendbtn.jpg" alt="tf-friendbtn" width="200" height="150" /></a>Also in TwitterFon is a button that I wish were in all twitter clients: Friends. This button <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-friendlist.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">brings up a list</a><span> of all the people you follow and will insert an @<span>username</span>. This is incredibly useful if I want to post a public comment to a specific user (or users) without having to remember their <span>username</span>, find a post from them in the timeline, or <span>mis</span>-use a reply if I&#8217;m posting something completely unrelated. Again, it makes sense.</span></p>
<p><span>Have said all this, there&#8217;s a few things confusing about TwitterFon. Instead of using in-line text links for @ replies and URLs, you click a blue arrow icon (typically meaning &#8220;More Info&#8221;) to open the link, or chose one if multiple links are in the tweet. Also, for replies, you can click on the tweet to bring up a single-tweet view then select &#8220;reply,&#8221; or you can tap their picture in the timeline. The latter just isn&#8217;t obvious, but it&#8217;s there with less taping none-the-less. Actually, that&#8217;s pretty much it for gripes against TwitterFon.</span></p>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p><span>It pretty much goes without saying that I find <span>TwitterFon to</span> be the better app, but I still keep <span>Tweetie</span> on page 2 of my iPhone. I do so partially because of the ability to easily search for @replies (which could be fixed in TwitterFon with the inclusion of the already built friend list button), but mainly because I paid $2.99 for it and have to convince myself I still need it.</span></p>
<p><span>Now, I don&#8217;t mean to knock <span>Tweetie</span> too much, it is still a really decent Twitter client. However, after seeing what TwitterFon can do for free with a better UI, I just don&#8217;t understand how <span>Tweetie</span> gets so much more attention.</span></p>
<p>Lastly, a note to all Twitter-users. They&#8217;re called &#8220;tweets,&#8221; not &#8220;toots.&#8221; (I&#8217;m looking at you <a href="http://twitter.com/gruber/status/1114312778"><span>@<span>gruber</span></span></a> &amp; <a href="http://twitter.com/hotdogsladies/status/1070044700"><span>@<span>hotdogsladies</span></span></a><span>!) The former is a post on Twitter, the latter is another word for fart. Speaking of which, <span>Tweetie</span> 1.2 </span><em>does</em> have something else TwitterFon doesn&#8217;t: a built in fart-noise function (along with flashlight) called <a href="http://www.atebits.com/pee/">PEE</a><span>, Popularity <span>EnhancEr</span>. If that&#8217;s your thing, go for it.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/battle-tweetie-vs-twitterfon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs Takes Medical Leave From Apple</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/jobs-takes-medical-leave-from-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/jobs-takes-medical-leave-from-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Repost from blog.conigs:
My Twitter feed was ablaze starting about an hour ago with variations of the above headline. Many news agencies are also reporting the same. The report is that he&#8217;ll be gone through June. But I&#8217;m not sure. I agree with Ryan Block:
Jobs finally stepping down (even if only for a few months), huh? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repost from <a href="http://blog.conigs.com/2009/01/jobs-takes-medical-leave-from-apple/">blog.conigs</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>My Twitter feed was ablaze starting about an hour ago with variations of the above headline. Many <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/01/steve-jobs-medi.html">news</a> <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10142947-37.html">agencies </a><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28661226/">are</a> <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Apple-CEO-Jobs-takes-medical-apf-14063916.html">also</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/technology/companies/15apple.html">reporting</a> <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2009/01/apple-ceo-steve.html">the</a> <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/01/14/apple-jobs-to-take-medical-leave-of-absence/">same</a>. The report is that he&#8217;ll be gone through June. But I&#8217;m not sure. I agree with <a href="http://twitter.com/gruber/status/1119389572">Ryan Block</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="entry-content">Jobs finally stepping down (even if only for a few months), huh? I dunno, something in my gut tells me he might not be back.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;ll see what happens over the coming months. Bot one thing can be certain: nearly every day most, if not all, of the tech blogs will be speculating and looking for information from their &#8220;sources&#8221; about Jobs&#8217; health.<br />
I just hope the man can get some peace.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/jobs-takes-medical-leave-from-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 3.291 seconds -->
