<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I Am Awesome &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iamawesome.net/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iamawesome.net</link>
	<description>Pretending the Internet cares about me since 2009.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cue Gob Bluth – Amazing Lazer Illusion</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/07/cue-gob-bluth-%e2%80%93-amazing-lazer-illusion/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/07/cue-gob-bluth-%e2%80%93-amazing-lazer-illusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[via @pablokorona]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed width="480" height="360" flashvars="embedded=true&#038;config=http%3a%2f%2fmeview.metro.co.uk%2fTSPlayer%2fJSON.aspx%3fid%3d25392%26type%3d0&amp;w=480&amp;h=360" menu="false" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" style="" src="http://meview.media.tigerspike.com/ugc/57/siteimages/flash/VideoPlayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"/><br />
[via @<a href="http://twitter.com/pablokorona/status/2762905607">pablokorona</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/07/cue-gob-bluth-%e2%80%93-amazing-lazer-illusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle: Tweetie vs TwitterFon</title>
		<link>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/battle-tweetie-vs-twitterfon/</link>
		<comments>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/battle-tweetie-vs-twitterfon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>conigs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweetie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitterfon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iamawesome.net/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first signed up for Twitter, all I used was their website. Later, I ventured into Twitterrific on my Mac. Then I started tweeting from my iPhone. Now, there&#8217;s no shortage of Twitter clients on this device. There&#8217;s Twitterrific, Twinkle, Twittelator, Tweetsville, Tweetie, and TwitterFon to name a few. If you&#8217;re haven&#8217;t guessed by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>When I first signed up for Twitter, all I used was their website. Later, I ventured into <span>Twitterrific</span> on my Mac. Then I started tweeting from my iPhone. Now, there&#8217;s no shortage of Twitter clients on this device. There&#8217;s </span><a href="http://iconfactory.com/software/twitterrific"><span><span>Twitterrific</span></span></a>, <a href="http://tapulous.com/twinkle/">Twinkle</a>, <a href="http://www.stone.com/Twittelator/"><span><span>Twittelator</span></span></a>, <a href="http://www.tweetsville.com/"><span><span>Tweetsville</span></span></a>, <a href="http://www.atebits.com/software/tweetie/"><span><span>Tweetie</span></span></a>, and <a href="http://twitterfon.net/">TwitterFon</a><span> to name a few. If you&#8217;re haven&#8217;t guessed by the headline, this post will concern just the last two, <span>Tweetie</span> &amp; TwitterFon ($2.99 and free, respectively).</span><span id="more-51"></span></p>
<p><span>At first, I just used <span>Twitterrific</span>. It was simple, let me post and read the timeline, and most importantly, remembered where I left off between launches. But I started to want more: searching, trends, ability to follow/<span>unfollow</span>, etc. I think I started using TwitterFon around version 1.1. It was nice, but didn&#8217;t quite feel right. I kept hearing about <span>Tweetie</span> from many blogs and that it was, perhaps, the best Twitter client for the iPhone. So I bit and paid the $2.99 for version 1.1.</span></p>
<p><span>Now that both apps have been recently updated (<span>Tweetie</span> v1.2, TwitterFon v1.4 as of this writing), and include many similar features, I decided a comparison was in order. I&#8217;m not going to cover every single feature of each app, just the ones I tend to use.</span></p>
<h1><span><span>Tweetie</span></span></h1>
<p><span>Let&#8217;s start with the supposed best-of-the-best, <span>Tweetie</span>. The first thing I (or pretty much anyone else) will notice is the UI. By default, <span>Tweetie</span> uses a </span><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-bubbles.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">chat bubble interface</a> to show the timeline. Personally, I think this is wrong. The chat-bubble paradigm implies conversation; more specifically, conversation between parties. In Twitter-land, that would translate to everyone I&#8217;m following gathered in one room, all shouting. Since these tweets rarely follow the same topic, it would sound like a jumbled mess. Fortunately, you have the option of a &#8220;simple&#8221; theme.</p>
<p><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-refresh.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-60" title="tweetie-refresh" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-refresh-200x300.jpg" alt="tweetie-refresh" width="200" height="300" /></a><span>However, even with the simple theme, there are still oddities in the UI. Take, for example, the refresh button. While the iPhone has a decent resolution, especially for a mobile device, it&#8217;s still only a 3.5&#8243; screen. Every pixel matters. While, yes, I do value negative space in design, the horrible placement of the refresh button in <span>Tweetie</span> is not a good use of said negative space. When I get to the top of my timeline, the first visible piece of information I&#8217;m interested in is almost 1/3 down the screen.</span></p>
<p>Speaking of wasted space, <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-dm.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">the inbox/outbox buttons</a><span> in the direct-message view are huge, disconnected, and just plain don&#8217;t work, design-wise. Fortunately, I don&#8217;t spend a ton of time in this view as I rarely use <span>DMs</span>.</span></p>
<p><span>Then there&#8217;s the reply chain. The recent update of <span>Tweetie</span> has a nice way to drill down the chain, </span><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-replychain.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">both directions</a>. I think this works well, especially compared to previous versions. Previously, you could drill down through text links, but going back up the chain required using a navigation button at the top. This meant if I drilled down into 6-7 replies, I&#8217;d have to use what has essentially become a &#8220;back&#8221; button just as many times to get back to the timeline. This new method is much better.</p>
<p><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-fbar.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-59" title="tweetie-fbar" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-fbar.jpg" alt="tweetie-fbar" width="200" height="192" /></a><span>Speaking of replies, there is a new method of replying, <span>favoriting</span>, and seeing the user profile in <span>Tweetie</span>. Swipe across the tweet to bring up a small tool bar with those functions. This has been described as &#8220;</span><a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2009/01/16/iphone-app-tweetie-gets-drafts-instapaper-flashlight-farts">Hot UI Action</a><span>.&#8221; I kinda agree, with one major caveat: swiping in most apps (starting with Mobile Mail) means delete. You could get around this conceptually by thinking &#8220;delete is a right-to-left swipe, I&#8217;ll swipe left to right to &#8216;push&#8217; the tweet out of the way to get to these three buttons underneath.&#8221; True. But right-to-left swipe still does the same thing, even though the tweet visually moves off screen to the right. It just doesn&#8217;t </span><em>feel</em> right.</p>
<p><span>Often times, I want to search for trends, specific topics, or nearby tweets. <span>Tweetie</span> places all three of these functions (and two more) under the &#8220;More&#8221; tab at the bottom. Two things bother me about this view. I feel all three of these functions (nearby, trends, and text search) fall under the search umbrella, yet they are </span><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tweetie-search.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">listed separately</a>. Secondly, there is no &#8220;Edit&#8221; mode for the tab bar. So I&#8217;m stuck with the default order and placement. Want to put search or trends in the tab bar for easy access? Sorry.</p>
<p><span>Now, <span>Tweetie</span> does a few other things very, very well. I love having the ability to go to a person&#8217;s profile and select &#8220;search @<span>username</span>&#8221; to see who else is talking to that user. It&#8217;s a nice little feature to use if someone posts a question to the hive mind as John <span>Hodgman</span> </span><a href="http://twitter.com/hodgman/status/1124062291">likes to put it</a><span>. I can tell if that user already has their question answered. Also, if someone posts a picture using <span>twitpic</span>, <span>Tweetie</span> will bring up just the picture, not the entire <span>twitpic</span> page in a <span>Webkit</span> view. It&#8217;s a nice little touch that makes viewing pictures just a little nicer.</span></p>
<h1>TwitterFon</h1>
<div id="attachment_56" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-replychain.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="size-full wp-image-56" title="tf-replychain" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-replychain.jpg" alt="I didn't obscure the conversation because tater-tots are awesome." width="200" height="179" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I didn&#39;t obscure the conversation because tater-tots are awesome.</p></div>
<p><span>Now for TwitterFon. Basically, take most of my gripes about <span>Tweetie</span> and fix them. Let&#8217;s start with speech bubbles. The only place these are used is in reply chains and direct message views. In both instances, it makes sense. You&#8217;re looking at a conversation, usually about one topic. As a bonus, there&#8217;s no navigation required to view reply chains. It&#8217;s all right there. The one downside to <span>TwitterFon&#8217;s</span> implementation is that it only shows this view if you follow both parties involved. I&#8217;m also pretty sure it won&#8217;t display a reply chain for more than two people. I haven&#8217;t had the ability to test this yet.</span></p>
<p>The refresh button? It&#8217;s put in <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-refresh.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">the proper place</a><span>. Now, to be fair, <span>Tweetie</span> can&#8217;t use this space for the refresh button. It supports multiple accounts and that area is used to navigate back to an account list. But I&#8217;m sure there are better ways to implement that.</span></p>
<p>TwitterFon also places all three search functions <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-search.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">neatly on one page</a><span>. Type to search, hit the speech-bubbles button for a list of trends, or tap the cross-hairs to find nearby posts within 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, or 500 miles. It just makes sense. The result? A nicely laid out UI for search, and no need for a &#8220;More&#8221; tab at the bottom.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-friendbtn.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-53" title="tf-friendbtn" src="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-friendbtn.jpg" alt="tf-friendbtn" width="200" height="150" /></a>Also in TwitterFon is a button that I wish were in all twitter clients: Friends. This button <a href="http://iamawesome.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tf-friendlist.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-51];player=img;">brings up a list</a><span> of all the people you follow and will insert an @<span>username</span>. This is incredibly useful if I want to post a public comment to a specific user (or users) without having to remember their <span>username</span>, find a post from them in the timeline, or <span>mis</span>-use a reply if I&#8217;m posting something completely unrelated. Again, it makes sense.</span></p>
<p><span>Have said all this, there&#8217;s a few things confusing about TwitterFon. Instead of using in-line text links for @ replies and URLs, you click a blue arrow icon (typically meaning &#8220;More Info&#8221;) to open the link, or chose one if multiple links are in the tweet. Also, for replies, you can click on the tweet to bring up a single-tweet view then select &#8220;reply,&#8221; or you can tap their picture in the timeline. The latter just isn&#8217;t obvious, but it&#8217;s there with less taping none-the-less. Actually, that&#8217;s pretty much it for gripes against TwitterFon.</span></p>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p><span>It pretty much goes without saying that I find <span>TwitterFon to</span> be the better app, but I still keep <span>Tweetie</span> on page 2 of my iPhone. I do so partially because of the ability to easily search for @replies (which could be fixed in TwitterFon with the inclusion of the already built friend list button), but mainly because I paid $2.99 for it and have to convince myself I still need it.</span></p>
<p><span>Now, I don&#8217;t mean to knock <span>Tweetie</span> too much, it is still a really decent Twitter client. However, after seeing what TwitterFon can do for free with a better UI, I just don&#8217;t understand how <span>Tweetie</span> gets so much more attention.</span></p>
<p>Lastly, a note to all Twitter-users. They&#8217;re called &#8220;tweets,&#8221; not &#8220;toots.&#8221; (I&#8217;m looking at you <a href="http://twitter.com/gruber/status/1114312778"><span>@<span>gruber</span></span></a> &amp; <a href="http://twitter.com/hotdogsladies/status/1070044700"><span>@<span>hotdogsladies</span></span></a><span>!) The former is a post on Twitter, the latter is another word for fart. Speaking of which, <span>Tweetie</span> 1.2 </span><em>does</em> have something else TwitterFon doesn&#8217;t: a built in fart-noise function (along with flashlight) called <a href="http://www.atebits.com/pee/">PEE</a><span>, Popularity <span>EnhancEr</span>. If that&#8217;s your thing, go for it.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iamawesome.net/2009/01/battle-tweetie-vs-twitterfon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.402 seconds -->
